One hundred and fifty-four years ago this week, seven friends sat for a portrait at Nathaniel L. Merrill’s Photographic Gallery in Springfield, Vermont. They look young enough to be in high school, or perhaps recent graduates. The carte-de-visite photo has a revenue stamp on the back, affixed and cancelled by the photographer on December 22, 1864. Were these fellows about to head home for Christmas or winter break? The end of the war was still six months away, but they had no idea how much longer it would last.
Revenue stamps were required by the U.S. Government on commercial photographs from August 1, 1864 until August 1, 1866, initially to raise funds to fight the Civil War, and then to pay off debts after the war ended in May 1865. Photographers were required to cancel a stamp after affixing it to the back of a photo.
Interesting about the stamp. I’d not heard of those before. The young men look older than they probably are, and solemn.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think you’re right about them looking older than they are. I considered referring to them as boys, but that didn’t seem right. They’re on the cusp of adulthood. I don’t think the war would have worried them much. Being young, they probably thought of it as a great adventure, if they were required to serve at all.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I notice that each has a hand on one of his companions, except for the young man in the front row, 2nd from the left, whose hands are crossed in his lap. I wonder if the photographer posed the group that way, and this young man couldn’t find a natural way to comply, so he crossed his hands.
LikeLiked by 3 people
They do seem intentionally posed. It must have been considered appropriate for a group of male friends at that time. Physical contact is quite common among girls in group photos from the era, but less common among boys.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like Liz, I was struck by how ‘touchy, feely’ this photograph is. They seem to exude brotherly love.
LikeLiked by 2 people
They make me think of an athletic team huddling or celebrating a victory. There’s a bond, or at least a camaraderie. Wish we knew more!
LikeLiked by 1 person
*Gasp!* Some of these boys look so young!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I wonder how they came to be such good friends. They look very close knit. That’s interesting about the stamps. I didn’t know that. Great photo!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Suzanne! The revenue stamps can be very helpful for dating these early images. Happy Saturday to you and your knight-errant!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you from both of us! Merry Christmas!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, and Merry Christmas to you! I should have said earlier, Happy First Day of Winter! 😉
LikeLike
I would say they – brothers – cousins… Look on those arms! I won’t pose man like this nowdays 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Today, men who are good friends might put a hand on a friend’s shoulder in a photo, but probably only if they are standing up. When sitting down, it would indicate a closer relationship, maybe family, as you suggest. By the way, Ilze, I have a new photo from Latvia which you might find interesting: https://tokensofcompanionship.blog/2018/11/29/learning-to-build-a-nation-students-in-the-new-latvia/. Thanks for visiting! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
How did I missed that!?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting about the revenue stamp on the back. Also, I don’t know why it is, but young men back then definitely looked older than they do today at the same age. Maybe they had more responsibilities?
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ve always thought the same thing about young men looking older in vintage photographs than young men of the same age today. I think for me it has something to do with the clothing they’re wearing being more formal.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, more formal clothing, plus not smiling as much makes quite a difference. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Clothing can certainly mature a person by several years. I find it difficult to guess a person’s age by looking at a single photo. I’ll often see a photo for sale of a young woman and think she was in her early twenties, and then read on the back that she was 16 in the photo! I find boys and men a little easier, but not much.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, there is that in the clothing. Also, they all look more serious, which makes you look older too.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Definitely!
LikeLike
Very nice outfits for the day!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s nice of you to visit some of my older posts, Sharon. I’ve been having trouble commenting on WordPress recently, due to a glitch with the comment form, but it seems to be fixed today.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A lot of glitches. I click on people and it does not go to their site. Sometimes on certain posts it does not allow me to comment even though there are other comments. Technology is a wonderful thing! Ha!
LikeLiked by 1 person