Cycling enthusiasts at a rally in London

No bicycles appear in this photograph, but the sign at upper right tells us that the occasion for this gathering was a cycling club rally of some kind.  Unfortunately, no one in the group is identified, and some of the names of the clubs are cut off at the edge of the photo.

Cycling club rally in London 3

Cycling club rally in London 4


The cabinet card was made by Arthur Simmons (1855-?), whose studio was at 258 Westminster Bridge Road.  Originally from Nottingham, Arthur appears in the 1881 census as a boarder in London, unmarried and working as a photographer, but it isn’t clear where he works.  He appears again as a photographer in the 1885 city directory, now at 258 Westminster Bridge Road.  Perplexingly, in the 1891 census his occupation is listed as Confectioner.  He’s also married with one child, a daughter named Ethel May.

However, Arthur’s career as a photographer didn’t end in a cloud of powdered sugar.  In the 1901 census, he’s back in the studio at 258 Westminster Bridge Road.  He has a second daughter, Beatrice.  His older daughter, Ethel May, now nineteen years old, is working with him as a Photographic Assistant.  Sadly, at this time Arthur is a widower.

Sometime in the next few years Arthur remarries.  He appears in 1910 on a baptismal record for his third daughter, Ivy Doris.  On the baptismal record, Arthur’s profession is Photographer.  However, just a year later, in the 1911 census, Arthur is once again a Confectioner.  His second wife and his middle daughter, Beatrice, who is now twenty-six, are working with him.  Ivy Doris is one year old.

I had planned to research the history of cycling in the UK for this post, but got sidetracked trying to sort out the creative endeavors of Arthur Simmons.  If you’re into cycling, please feel free to comment on the photo!  If you aren’t into cycling, you can always leave a comment about confections.

Cycling club rally in London 2

Cycling club rally in London 5



32 thoughts on “Cycling enthusiasts at a rally in London

Add yours

  1. Arthur Simmons sounds like a very intriguing man. In today’s world he would probably be taking photos of his confections and posting them on social media. 😉 The cycling enthusiasts look like a fun group!

    Liked by 3 people

  2. What an intriguing collection of facial expressions and postures! They all seem so comfortable with each other, packed together for the photo. Carefree yet dressed quite formally, most wearing hats. But are they cyclists? Are some of the men wearing what would may have been considered cycling attire hats at that time (ascot, or newsboy style)? It’s hard to imagine any of the women cycling in the clothing they’re wearing, but maybe…?

    For some reason, the woman seated front, second from left, makes me think Margaret Hamilton who played the Wicked Witch of the East in the Wizard of Oz!

    Liked by 3 people

    1. I looked up Margaret Hamilton and I see what you mean!

      The three men on the right side of the photo definitely look like cyclists to me. They’re wearing flowers (ribbons?) on their lapels, which must signify something. Actually, all the men are wearing those, as are some of the women. This group may have been affiliated with one of the clubs, which would explain why the women came to watch, rather than ride. We need someone with cycling expertise to chime in!

      Liked by 3 people

  3. Wonderful photo! I absolutely adore the hats! Perhaps Arthur ran a confectionary where he gave away truffles he made as an enticement to pose at his photography studio? But seriously, possibly there were two Arthur Simmonses?

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I kept asking that same question, whether there might be two men with the same name, roughly the same age, both from Nottingham, with a child or two with the same names. I finally ruled out that possibility when I found the baptismal record for Ivy Doris. How many children are named Ivy Doris? On a side note, photoLondon (no longer updated) says Arthur died in 1907 in Bristol. I’m sure that’s a mistake.

      I suspect you’re right about the truffles. Photography was an extremely competitive business in a place like London. Truffles would have given Arthur a significant advantage! 🙂

      Liked by 3 people

  4. The expressions and poses are just priceless! The young woman with her hand on her hip and a baleful expression is saying one of two things: “Seriously? You’re going to take a picture of me wearing this hat?” or “If looks could kill, you’d be dead, mister.”

    Liked by 2 people

  5. I was intrigued by this photo and had to do some research. I’m guessing we are looking at a cycling group from the 1880’s. This was around the time of the first ‘safety bicycles’ (chain drive, two equally sized wheels). Before that the ‘penny farthing (high front wheel with pedals affixed) were the common model. I was surprised to learn that the manner of ladies dress in the photo would not have been unusual for ladies cycling, particularly after the introduction of the safety bike. The front wheeler could be dangerous when skirts could become entangled in the front wheel. Plus, the safety bike was the first with pneumatic tires for a more comfortable ride and an improved braking system.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Very interesting, Bob! I didn’t know any of that. I see pictures of penny-farthings from time to time. Riders have to sit high up on those. They look neat but I’d probably be afraid of falling from such a height. The name comes from the British penny and farthing coins, the penny being large and the farthing being small.

      I wasn’t sure about the date of this photo. The puffs at the shoulders of the women’s dresses are typical of the early 1890s. The sleeves got bigger as the decade went on. I don’t know if the style had caught on yet at the end of the 1880s. The early 1890s would also make sense as far as cycling is concerned, considering what you found in your research. Thanks for the helpful comments!


    1. Thank you for that great link, Louise! Apparently the races at Herne Hill attracted a large number of spectators. Racers were the fastest men on earth at that time. That puts things into perspective, doesn’t it? I was surprised to read that racing on roads was outlawed. I suppose attitudes toward sport were different in the late 1800s than they are today.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Just today, I came across someone who’d been north of Houston to visit a business that combines fancy chocolates and barbeque. The owner wanted to have a candy/chocolate shop, but wasn’t sure he could make a profit, so he added barbeque as a sideline. Perhaps some of the same dynamic was at work here.

    I’ve tried and tried to imagine any of that group bicycling in those outfits, and just can’t do it. I suppose it was possible, but a combination of those dresses and spokes seems like a recipe for disaster. I was interested in the penny/farthing connection. I never knew what those odd bicycles were called, and like so many names, that one’s quite reasonable if you know the history.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. The combination of confections and studio portraiture makes sense at that time. Both businesses involved selling something which didn’t cost much and which might be purchased on impulse. Each business could also be used to advertise the other.

      Funnily enough, I have two studio portraits of a group of friends eating chocolates! I’d forgotten them until now. The first one is Four friends with chocolates in Bridgton, Maine (1 of 2). The second one is here.


  7. (late to the comment-fest, as always these days…) When cycling first became popular, there was a lot of hoo-hah about the propriety of women cycling with various flavours of misogyny rearing their ugly heads, from worry about bicycles giving women too much freedom to concern about the interaction of saddles, and, ahem, ladyparts. And of course the new bifurcated garments for women cycling (you can’t really call them trousers) – how daring!
    Penny-farthings are pretty precarious, but did you know that people had races on them? I seem to remember from my time at Tyne and Wear Museums that they have some cycling trophies won by a local chap on his penny-farthing bicycle.
    Actually, I just found the chap:
    (Sorry, don’t know how to make the link a link)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The idea of women having greater freedom of movement must have been quite unsettling to the patriarchy. To women of modest means, bicycles must have been liberating. I imagine wealthier women didn’t benefit as much, either because they were more mobile to begin with, or because they were less likely to adopt the bicycle as a means of transportation.

      George Waller looks like a champion! I occasionally see old photos for sale of men wearing medals or standing next to trophies, but most are unidentified.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: