Lydia Clibborn Pike (?) in Cork, Ireland

The name “L.C. Pike” is written on the back of this carte-de-visite.  Generally a name on the back of a portrait refers to the sitter, but not always, so it’s important to try to find corroborating information.  I searched on Ancestry for an L.C. Pike who was about forty years old in the early 1860s and living in Cork, Ireland.  Only one came up, so I’m optimistic she may be the right person.

Lydia Clibborn Pike was born into a Quaker family in September 1821 in historic County Tyrone, in what is today Northern Ireland.  She married Ebenezer Pike (not a close relation) in Cork when she was nineteen years old and he was almost 35.  They were married 42 years, until his death in 1883.  They had at least eight children who survived to adulthood.  She died at the age of 88, in March 1900, in Bessborough, County Cork.

The photograph was taken at the studio of Edward J. Harding & Son, Portrait Painters & Photographists.  The senior Harding was almost certainly the same Edward J. Harding (1804-1870) listed as “Portrait Painter” in A Dictionary of Irish Artists (1913).

L.C. Pike in Cork 3

This is my first blog post featuring a portrait from Ireland.  After more than a year, the blog has yet to receive a visitor from the Emerald Isle.  I do hope Lydia Clibborn will change that.

L.C. Pike in Cork 2

Update on June 5:  I’ve zoomed in on the flower and fern, below.  I hadn’t noticed the fern until it was pointed out by astute visitors yesterday!

L.C. Pike in Cork 5

I also zoomed in as far as possible on the ring hanging at the end of the chain.  There does appear to be something else attached to the ring … maybe a key?

L.C. Pike in Cork 6

Finally, I’m pleased to report that the blog received its first visitor from Ireland (Éire) yesterday, after this post was published.

17 thoughts on “Lydia Clibborn Pike (?) in Cork, Ireland

Add yours

  1. How great to see an early Irish photograph. I actually had a viewer from Ireland to my photographers site today but it is rather a rare occurrence. Also, my own collection of cdv photos is quite small and I wonder if famine and mass emigration played some part in this. Dublin had lots of photographers (19th century) but that was far and away the biggest city in the country.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thank you, Christine! I see so many photos for sale in the UK (on eBay), but few are from Ireland. I’ve noticed one or two dealers in Ireland but haven’t bought from them. You mention famine and emigration. I’ve also wondered if poverty might have been a factor preventing many families from buying portraits. This carte came from a dealer in Wales (Llanwrtyd Wells). I have no idea how it ended up there. Of course, dealers travel and buy from each other all the time, so older photos get shuffled around and connections to families get lost.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Interesting. 🙂 I would never have known that letter was a P. That might help me identify something in a card I bought recently (if I can remember which photo it is… how odd that I remember the writing more than the image!)

    Try using Eire as a tag as well as or instead of Ireland. That might attract more people from there. Normally when we think of Ireland in this part of the world, we think of Northern Ireland, and of the south part separately as Eire.

    Wales is fairly close to Eire, as the crow flies (though it might have to swim some of the way!)

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Great suggestion! I wouldn’t have thought of using Eire as a tag. Here in the States it’s fashionable to claim some Irish ancestry, but many who have a little (like me) know nothing about those ancestors. Mine probably came over during the famine, but I don’t know what part of the island they came from. The census records just say they were born in Ireland.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I’d agree that poverty would be the answer to the rarity of Irish CDV and other forms of old photography, not to mention a small population.

    Brad, do you think she is holding a fern and a flower – I’m not sure if the fern is part of the deterioration of the image? Do you know if their is any symbolic significance to that if they are fer and flower? I love her exceedingly long chain. It appears to have a ring on it. It is a lovely rare image.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Didn’t find this comment until after replying to another, dammit. The detail images are great! I don’t think the flower is a pansy, now. Maybe a fully opened rose? I bet roses mean lovey dovey things, too. . . Yep! The type of love is symbolised through the colour of the rose, apparently.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. I think she’s holding a fern and a flower, and I think her chain has something else on it as there’s something dark hanging level with the flower she’s holding. I love how her waist is accentuated and the details on the edge of the sleeves, although they must have been terribly impractical (like the rest of her dress!)

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I also find her wide sleeves beautiful, if impractical. I examined the dark mark you mentioned, and it looks like a flaw in the emulsion (printing), rather than something she’s wearing. Regarding the objects hanging at the end of the chain, I’ve added a detail image at the end of the post which helps. Thanks for your comment!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. It can be a family jewel (her mother or grandmother).
        In some reasons, the ring could be removed from the left hand and put on the right hand, or worn on a chain instead of the right hand.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks so much, Jadi! I didn’t know there were Quakers in Ireland, either. I should probably do more research for each post, but it’s very easy to get carried away, and then the post takes forever to put together. I enjoy the variety of topics on your blog and your lighthearted tone. Your most recent post–about throwing out your back–was painful to read, but the humor made it seem alright in the end. I hope that’s true! Even if it means you can’t be Superwoman anymore.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: